GoldMine-topBanner1440x600
Menu

Issue #3

Issue 3 of the Gold Mine brings you 3 articles that gather 3 diverse opinions on using research (no wait, don’t run) to better assess our users’ evolving relationships with our online brands.

After all, we’re all a bit different now, in ways we’d never have imagined at the start of 2020.  Knowing your customers a bit better may be the difference between success or stasis.

(A quick FYI:  we send out the Gold Mine email every 3-4 weeks – sign up to receive it so you don’t miss out. You can view the previous issue here.)

How to screw up a survey + why the Customer Satisfaction question sucks

BAD SURVEYS DON'T SMELL

Many options exist for gathering user insights but, typically, ‘let’s do a survey’ is the path of least resistance.

Surveys are the default of user research: easy and fast to do, and cost effective. Also: easy to screw up, resulting in meaningless or even misleading data that’s then used as the basis of design, UX and other decision making.

This article, from the author of Just Enough Research, points out some of the bigger issues that plague most surveys.  Find out how not to do it:

Read Article

How to run surveys better

THE PRACTICAL ARTICLE: HOW TO ASK THE RIGHT QUESTIONS

So how to get surveys right?  They’re not going away anytime soon, so here’s a step-by-step guide to designing survey questions that will give you useful data.

Read Article

Now, ignore the data

RESEARCH IS ESSENTIAL, BUT NOT CRUCIAL

We’ve featured the above articles as the web is obsessed by surveys, and there’s so many bad ones. So let’s say you’ve absorbed their lessons and have just done a great survey, got great results. What next?

This engaging article lifts the lid on the limitations of taking the results at face value, explaining, perhaps counter-intuitively, why you should not always simply design what your users ask for.

Read Article

Ready to fuel up and get going?

Or just find out more about how we roll

GET IN TOUCH